FOI Disclosure Log 2026

Date of Request: 02/01/2026

Reference: 0001/26

I would like to request information about the business-intelligence, company-information and credit-reference products used by your organisation, as follows,

1. Products used since 1 January 2022

Please confirm whether your organisation currently uses, or has used at any point since 1 January 2022, any of the following products:

Endole

Beauhurst

Dun & Bradstreet (D&B)

Creditsafe

Experian Business

Equifax Business

TransUnion (UK Commercial Data & Credit Risk)

Company Check (Creditsafe group)

DueDil / FullCircl

Artesian

GlobalDatabase

Bureau van Dijk – Orbis / Fame (Moody’s)

Plimsoll Analysis

Kompass

Crunchbase

PitchBook

S&P Capital IQ / Market Intelligence

Graydon UK

Red Flag Alert

The Data City

For each product used, please provide:
a. Product name
b. Whether it is currently in use (Yes/No) c. Main purpose(s) for which it is used

2. Contract information

For each product identified above, please provide the following where held:

a. Supplier / vendor name
b. Contract reference number
c. Contract start date
d. Contract end date
e. Next renewal or break date
f. Contract value (annual or total)
g. Procurement route used (e.g., CCS framework name and lot, tender, direct award)

If any commercial information is withheld under Section 43, please still provide the non-exempt data, including start date, end date, supplier name, and procurement route.

3. Internal ownership

For each product currently in use, please provide:

a. Job title (not the name) of the person responsible for the product b. The department or team that manages it

4. Past products no longer used

Where a product listed above was used after 1 January 2022 but is no longer in use, please provide:

a. Product name
b. Contract start date
c. Contract end date
d. Contract value (annual or total)

Date of Request: 08/01/2026

Reference: 0002/26

Under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, please provide the following information for the period 1 January 2023 – 31 December 2024:

1. The number of occasions on which cyber or information security risks appeared on the agenda of your governing body (or equivalent oversight body).
2. The name(s) of any committee(s) or board(s) with formal responsibility for cyber or information security oversight.
3. Whether documented criteria exist for escalating significant cyber incidents to the governing body or senior leadership (yes/no; if yes, please provide or summarise).
4. The number of governing body members (or equivalent) who completed cyber or information security training during this period, and the total number of members in that body.
5. Whether an independent assessment of your cyber security arrangements (e.g. internal audit, external review, or third-party assessment) was reported to the governing body during this period (yes/no; if yes, please state the type of assessment).

Please note: no technical details, vulnerabilities, or sensitive operational information are requested. If this information is readily available, broken down by year, please provide it; otherwise, an aggregate figure for the period is sufficient.

Date of Request: 03/02/2026

Reference: 0005/26

Please can you tell me how many police officers' pensions have been forfeited in the past ten years in the police force you oversee. If this exceeds the FOI time limit, please give me the number for the past five years. 

I would like the information broken down by year.

Date of Request: 19/03/2026

Reference: 0006/26

I write further to your email dated 10 March requesting information. This request falls as a freedom of information request. I note you seek access to the following information:

Please provide the following information:
1. What organisations applied for awards but were deemed unsuccessful.
2. For what specific purpose did they apply.
3. Why was their application refused?

Date of Request: 02/06/2026

Reference: 008/26

I write further to your email dated 7 May 2026. This request falls as a freedom of information request. I note you seek access to the following information:

1. The total projected cost of the scheme, including the expected contract value.

2. Copies of any business case, report, or assessment used to justify the decision to fund private security patrols rather than additional police officers or PCSOs.

3. Any evaluation or outcome report relating to the Melton Mowbray pilot scheme.

4. Details of the procurement process, including whether the contract will be openly tendered.

5. Any declarations of interest or conflict-of-interest records relating to individuals involved in the decision-making or procurement process for this scheme.

Date of Request: 03/06/2026

Reference: 009/26

This request falls as a freedom of information request. I note you seek access to the following information:

1. How many complaints against the police the commissioner has received over the past 10 years, if 10 years is not retained then I would reduce this to the past 5 years.

2. According to the above (request 1), how many were upheld

Date of Request: 02/06/2026

Reference: 0010/26

I write further to your email dated 16 May 2026. This request falls as a freedom of information request. I note you seek access to the following information:

What quantified evidence do you have that for the "street marshall" trial
a) residents felt safer?
b) it was cost-effective?

Date of Request: 16/06/2026

Reference: 0011/26

This request falls as a freedom of information request. I note you seek access to the following information:

Please provide a copy of the project plan/timetable in place to manage the closure of the OPCC.

Date of Request: 13/06/2026

Reference: 0012/26

This request falls as a freedom of information request. I note you seek access to the following information:

You have recently launched the Safe Roads, Safe Communities project claiming it “is helping women feel more confident, informed and safer when using the roads in their day-to-day lives.”

1) What evidence do you have that this section of society has a greater need for such a programme than any other?
2) How many individuals have attended?
3) What empirical evidence do you have that is has been successful?
4) When is the equivalent programme for men?